(P.A. 81-352, S. 2; P.A. 83-384, S. 2; P.A. 84-546, S. 118, 173; P.A. 85-140, S. 5; P.A. 87-9, S. 2, 3; P.A. 87-569, S. 2; P.A. 94-141; P.A. 95-356, S. 2; P.A. 96-268, S. 12, 34; P.A. 01-196, S. 1, 2; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 01-9, S. 12, 131; P.A. 02-93, S. 1; P.A. 03-2, S. 49; 03-62, S. 23; 03-84, S. 41; 03-224, S. 13; P.A. 04-257, S. 81; P.A. 06-149, S. 26; P.A. 07-111, S. 4; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 09-3, S. 139; P.A. 12-89, S. 7, 14; P.A. 14-7, S. 17, 18; 14-9, S. 1; 14-122, S. 188; 14-217, S. 260; P.A. 16-26, S. 8.)
Cited. 240 Conn. 343; Id., 623. Postjudgment execution statutes do not provide specific exemption from further execution of a judgment debtor's residual, postgarnishment wages held in third party's bank account, and this section does not extend Sec. 52-361a execution exemption to wages disbursed to the debtor. 324 Conn. 228. Trial court improperly created an exemption not provided by statute. 49 Conn.App. 503. Subsec. (i): Court required to enter order determining issues raised by exemption claim. 22 Conn.App. 260.