All
All
Parallel
Title
Appellant
Respondent
Lawyer
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant.
Let's chat.
Log in
Sign Up
Select Country
India
UK
&
Ireland
AMICUS AI
CaseIQ
Keyword Research
Parallel Search
Browse
Commentaries
Columns
My Project
New chat
Federal
U.S. Supreme Court
Federal Circuit
1st Circuit
2d Circuit
3d Circuit
4th Circuit
5th Circuit
6th Circuit
7th Circuit
8th Circuit
9th Circuit
10th Circuit
11th Circuit
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Board of Immigration Appeals
Special Courts
Bankruptcy
State
Alabama
Alaska
Arkansas
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District Of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Guam
Hawaii
Iowa
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Massachusetts
Maryland
Maine
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Mississippi
Montana
Nebraska
North Carolina
North Dakota
New Hampshire
New Jersey
Northern Mariana Islands
New Mexico
Nevada
New York
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Virginia
Vermont
Washington
Wisconsin
West Virginia
Wyoming
Ohio Admin. Code 109:4-3-09 : — Consumer Protection3 - Deceptive Acts or Trade Practices in Connection with Consumer Transactions —3-09 - Failure to deliver; substitution of goods or services
Text
(A)
It shall be a deceptive act or practice in connection with a consumer transaction for a supplier:
(1)
To advertise or promise prompt delivery unless, at the time of the advertisement, the supplier has taken reasonable action to insure prompt delivery;
(2)
To accept money from a consumer for goods or services ordered by mail, telephone, the internet, or otherwise and then permit eight weeks to elapse without:
(a)
Making shipment or delivery of the goods or services ordered;
(b)
Making a full refund;
(c)
Advising the consumer of the duration of an extended delay and offering to send the consumer a refund within two weeks if the consumer so requests; or
(d)
Furnishing similar goods or services of equal or greater value as a good faith substitute if the consumer agrees.
(B)
When a consumer transaction involves goods it shall be a deceptive act or practice for a supplier to furnish similar goods of equal or greater value when there was no intention to ship, deliver, or install the original goods ordered. The act of a supplier in furnishing similar merchandise of equal or greater value as a good faith substitute does not violate this rule.
(C)
For the purposes of this rule, goods or services may not be considered of "equal or greater value" if they are not substantially similar to the goods or services ordered, or are not fit for the purposes intended, or if the supplier normally offers the substituted goods or services at a lower price than the "regular price", as defined in rule
109:4-3-12
of the Administrative Code, of the goods ordered.
Ohio Admin. Code 109:4-3-09
Effective: 5/17/2020
Five Year Review (FYR) Dates: 3/2/2020 and 05/07/2025
Promulgated Under:
119.03
Statutory Authority:
1345.05
Rule Amplifies:
1345.02
Prior Effective Dates: 06/15/1973, 08/28/1981, 03/14/2005
×