All
All
Parallel
Title
Appellant
Respondent
Lawyer
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant.
Let's chat.
Log in
Sign Up
Select Country
India
UK
&
Ireland
AMICUS AI
CaseIQ
Keyword Research
Parallel Search
Browse
Commentaries
Columns
My Project
New chat
Federal
U.S. Supreme Court
Federal Circuit
1st Circuit
2d Circuit
3d Circuit
4th Circuit
5th Circuit
6th Circuit
7th Circuit
8th Circuit
9th Circuit
10th Circuit
11th Circuit
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Board of Immigration Appeals
Special Courts
Bankruptcy
State
Alabama
Alaska
Arkansas
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District Of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Guam
Hawaii
Iowa
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Massachusetts
Maryland
Maine
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Mississippi
Montana
Nebraska
North Carolina
North Dakota
New Hampshire
New Jersey
Northern Mariana Islands
New Mexico
Nevada
New York
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Virginia
Vermont
Washington
Wisconsin
West Virginia
Wyoming
5 C.F.R. § 430.305 : Administrative Personnel — OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT — CIVIL SERVICE REGULATIONS — PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT — MANAGING SENIOR EXECUTIVE PERFORMANCE — System standards for SES performance management systems
Text
(a)
Each agency performance management system must incorporate the following system standards:
(1)
Use critical elements based on OPM-validated executive competencies to evaluate executive leadership and results, including the quality of the executive's performance;
(2)
Align performance requirements with agency mission and strategic planning initiatives;
(3)
Define performance standards for each of the summary rating performance levels, which also may be used for the individual elements or performance requirements being appraised;
(4)
Appraise each senior executive's performance at least annually against performance requirements based on established performance standards and other measures;
(5)
Derive an annual summary rating through a mathematical method that ensures executives' performance aligns with level descriptors contained in performance standards that clearly differentiate levels above fully successful, while prohibiting a forced distribution of rating levels for senior executives;
(6)
Establish five summary performance levels as follows:
(i)
An outstanding level;
(ii)
An exceeds fully successful level;
(iii)
A fully successful level;
(iv)
A minimally satisfactory level; and
(v)
An unsatisfactory level;
(7)
Include equivalency statements in the system description for agency-specific terms for the five summary performance levels aligning them with the five performance levels required in §430.305(a)(6); and
(8)
Use performance appraisals as a basis to adjust pay, reward, retain, and develop senior executives or make other personnel decisions, including removals as specified in §430.312.
(b)
An agency may develop its own performance management system for senior executives in accordance with the requirements of this section.
(c)
OPM may establish, and refine as needed, a basic performance management system incorporating all requirements of this section, which agencies may adopt, with limited adaptation, for performance management of its senior executives.
5 C.F.R. § 430.305
80 FR 57694, 9/25/2015
×