210 Pa. Code § 69.256 : APPELLATE PROCEDURE — INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURES — INTERNAL OPERATING PROCEDURES OF THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA —APPELLATE JURISDICTION — Decisions; Effect of Disagreements

(a) If a draft opinion in circulation in any case produces any combination of four or more proposed dissents, objections, or concurring opinions, the opinion-writing Judge shall not file the opinion but shall notify the President Judge to list the case for consideration at the next judicial conference. For purposes of this subsection the notation "concur in result only" shall not be considered in the foregoing combination. If, pursuant to vote after judicial conference consideration, a majority of all of the Judges, as well as a majority of the Judges who heard the case or to whom it was submitted on briefs, favor the result reached in the circulated draft opinion, that opinion, together with any concurring or dissenting opinions and notations of concurrences or dissents, shall be filed. Otherwise, if judicial conference consideration and vote does not warrant reassignment in accordance with § 69.254, the President Judge shall list the case for reargument before the Court en banc.
(b) When there exists a vacancy or a recusal among the Commissioned Judges that results in an even number of Commissioned Judges voting on a circulating panel opinion or en banc opinion, and when the vote of all participating Commissioned Judges results in a tie, the opinion shall be filed as circulated. The opinion shall contain a footnote on the first page indicating that the opinion is filed pursuant to this paragraph. Unless there is a majority vote of the participating Commissioned Judges to report, the opinion shall not be reported.

210 Pa. Code § 69.256

The provisions of this § 69.256 amended November 21, 2013, effective immediately, 43 Pa.B. 7074.
Amended by Pennsylvania Bulletin, Vol 50, No. 5. February 1, 2020, effective 2/1/2020