All
All
Parallel
Title
Appellant
Respondent
Lawyer
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant.
Let's chat.
Log in
Sign Up
Select Country
India
UK
&
Ireland
AMICUS AI
CaseIQ
Keyword Research
Parallel Search
Browse
Commentaries
Columns
My Project
New chat
Federal
U.S. Supreme Court
Federal Circuit
1st Circuit
2d Circuit
3d Circuit
4th Circuit
5th Circuit
6th Circuit
7th Circuit
8th Circuit
9th Circuit
10th Circuit
11th Circuit
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Board of Immigration Appeals
Special Courts
Bankruptcy
State
Alabama
Alaska
Arkansas
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District Of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Guam
Hawaii
Iowa
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Massachusetts
Maryland
Maine
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Mississippi
Montana
Nebraska
North Carolina
North Dakota
New Hampshire
New Jersey
Northern Mariana Islands
New Mexico
Nevada
New York
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Virginia
Vermont
Washington
Wisconsin
West Virginia
Wyoming
120 Mass. Reg. 304.03 : — PAROLE BOARDAppeal and Reconsideration Process: General Provisions — Reconsideration of Decision of Parole Board Members
Text
(1)
An inmate may petition a hearing panel, in writing, for reconsideration of a decision to deny, rescind, or revoke parole, or to grant parole subject to special conditions. Such petition may not be submitted earlier than 90 days after the date the inmate receives notification of the hearing panel decision, except when such petition is submitted at the same time as an appeal pursuant to
120 CMR 304.02
. The petition for reconsideration must state specific facts which justify reconsideration based on one or more of the following grounds:
(a)
There is a material change in personal or other circumstances which requires a different decision.
(b)
The tasks mandated by the parole hearing panel have been accomplished.
(c)
Especially mitigating circumstances justify a different decision.
(d)
There are compelling reasons why a more lenient decision should be rendered.
(2)
The petitioner may not base a petition for reconsideration on the same grounds previously rejected by a reconsideration hearing panel, or an appeal pursuant to
120 CMR 304.02
.
(3)
The procedure for reconsideration of parole release decisions is the same as that for the appeal process described in
120 CMR 304.02
.
(4)
The hearing panel that decided the case will decide the request for reconsideration.
120 CMR 304.03
Amended by Mass Register Issue 1330, eff. 1/13/2017.
×