All
All
Parallel
Title
Appellant
Respondent
Lawyer
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant.
Let's chat.
Log in
Sign Up
Select Country
India
UK
&
Ireland
AMICUS AI
CaseIQ
Keyword Research
Parallel Search
Browse
Commentaries
Columns
My Project
New chat
Federal
U.S. Supreme Court
Federal Circuit
1st Circuit
2d Circuit
3d Circuit
4th Circuit
5th Circuit
6th Circuit
7th Circuit
8th Circuit
9th Circuit
10th Circuit
11th Circuit
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Board of Immigration Appeals
Special Courts
Bankruptcy
State
Alabama
Alaska
Arkansas
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District Of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Guam
Hawaii
Iowa
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Massachusetts
Maryland
Maine
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Mississippi
Montana
Nebraska
North Carolina
North Dakota
New Hampshire
New Jersey
Northern Mariana Islands
New Mexico
Nevada
New York
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Virginia
Vermont
Washington
Wisconsin
West Virginia
Wyoming
N.J. Admin. Code § 13:45A-31.5 : LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY — ADMINISTRATIVE RULES OF THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS — PRIVATE PROPERTY AND NON-CONSENSUAL TOWING COMPANIES —31.5 - Unreasonable fees
Text
(a)
A fee for private property towing or other non-consensual towing services, and storage services, shall be presumed unreasonable if it is:
1.
More than 25 percent higher than the fee charged by the towing company or storage facility for the same services when provided with the consent of the owner or operator of the motor vehicle; or
2.
More than 50 percent higher than the fee charged for such other non-consensual towing or related storage service by other towing companies or storage facilities operating in the municipality from which the vehicle was towed.
(b)
Notwithstanding (a) above, a fee will be presumed unreasonable if it exceeds the maximum amount that may be charged for the service according to a schedule of fees set forth in a municipal ordinance adopted pursuant to section 1 of P.L. 1979, c. 101 (
40:48-2.4
9) from the municipality in which the vehicle to be towed is situated.
(c)
Notwithstanding (a) and (b) above, there is a rebuttable presumption of reasonableness for a fee charged in connection with non-consensual towing of a motor vehicle if it is authorized by a law enforcement officer and the fee has been established by a:
1.
Ordinance or resolution enacted by a municipality or other political subdivision in this State; or
2.
Contract between a municipality or other political subdivision in this State and the towing company.
N.J. Admin. Code § 13:45A-31.5
Amended by 53 N.J.R. 1503(a), effective 9/7/2021
×