An applicant shall provide evidence of projected impact by taking into account existing planning area market share of existing non-special MRT services and future population growth or by providing sufficient evidence that the current population is underserved by the existing non-special MRT services, if any, within the planning area. An applicant proposing an additional non-special MRT unit pursuant to the exceptions to need standards referenced in (3)(b)2. shall not be required to document impact on existing and approved services as required by this paragraph.
Special MRT Equipment
Capacity
Minimum Aggregate Utilization
Minimum Projected Volume
Gamma Knife
500
80%
300 by 3rd Year of Operation
Heavy Particle Accelerator
4,000 per Gantry
2,400 per Gantry by 3ed Year of Operation
Dedicated SRS LINAC (including CyberKnife)
850
510 by 3rd Year of Operation
OR-based IORT
350
150 by 3rd Year of Operation
Where capacity is measured in annual procedures; where minimum aggregate utilization is the aggregate utilization rate for all existing special purpose MRT units of the same type (Gamma Knife utilization for Gamma Knife, etc.) in the planning area, except that for those existing special purpose MRT units that have not reported data in the most recent survey year, the Department shall include the non-reporting unit at the statewide average utilization rate for special purpose equipment of the same type; and where the minimum projected volume is measured in procedures per year.
An applicant shall provide evidence of projected impact by taking into account existing planning area market share of existing special purpose MRT services and future population growth or by providing sufficient evidence that the current population is underserved by the existing special purpose MRT services, if any, within the planning area.
Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. R. 111-2-2-.42
O.C.G.A. §§ 31-2 et seq., 31-6 et seq.