All
All
Parallel
Title
Appellant
Respondent
Lawyer
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant.
Let's chat.
Log in
Sign Up
Select Country
India
UK
&
Ireland
AMICUS AI
CaseIQ
Keyword Research
Parallel Search
Browse
Commentaries
Columns
My Project
New chat
Federal
U.S. Supreme Court
Federal Circuit
1st Circuit
2d Circuit
3d Circuit
4th Circuit
5th Circuit
6th Circuit
7th Circuit
8th Circuit
9th Circuit
10th Circuit
11th Circuit
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Board of Immigration Appeals
Special Courts
Bankruptcy
State
Alabama
Alaska
Arkansas
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District Of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Guam
Hawaii
Iowa
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Massachusetts
Maryland
Maine
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Mississippi
Montana
Nebraska
North Carolina
North Dakota
New Hampshire
New Jersey
Northern Mariana Islands
New Mexico
Nevada
New York
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Virginia
Vermont
Washington
Wisconsin
West Virginia
Wyoming
30 C.F.R. § 100.3 : Mineral Resources — MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR — CIVIL PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT OF 1977 — CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES FOR PROPOSED ASSESSMENT OF CIVIL PENALTIES — Determination of penalty amount; regular assessment
Text
(a)
General.
(1)
Except as provided in §
100.5(e)
, the operator of any mine in which a violation occurs of a mandatory health or safety standard or who violates any other provision of the Mine Act, as amended, shall be assessed a civil penalty of not more than $85,580. Each occurrence of a violation of a mandatory safety or health standard may constitute a separate offense. The amount of the proposed civil penalty shall be based on the criteria set forth in sections 105(b) and 110(i) of the Mine Act. These criteria are:
(i)
The appropriateness of the penalty to the size of the business of the operator charged;
(ii)
The operator's history of previous violations;
(iii)
Whether the operator was negligent;
(iv)
The gravity of the violation;
(v)
The demonstrated good faith of the operator charged in attempting to achieve rapid compliance after notification of a violation; and
(vi)
The effect of the penalty on the operator's ability to continue in business.
(2)
A regular assessment is determined by first assigning the appropriate number of penalty points to the violation by using the appropriate criteria and tables set forth in this section. The total number of penalty points will then be converted into a dollar amount under the penalty conversion table in paragraph (g) of this section. The penalty amount will be adjusted for demonstrated good faith in accordance with paragraph (f) of this section.
(b)
The appropriateness of the penalty to the size of the business of the operator charged.
The appropriateness of the penalty to the size of the mine operator's business is calculated by using both the size of the mine cited and the size of the mine's controlling entity. The size of coal mines and their controlling entities is measured by coal production. The size of metal and nonmetal mines and their controlling entities is measured by hours worked. The size of independent contractors is measured by the total hours worked at all mines. Penalty points for size are assigned based on Tables I to V. As used in these tables, the terms "annual tonnage" and "annual hours worked" mean coal produced and hours worked in the previous calendar year. In cases where a full year of data is not available, the coal produced or hours worked is prorated to an annual basis. This criterion accounts for a maximum of 25 penalty points.
(c)
History of previous violations.
An operator's history of previous violations is based on both the total number of violations and the number of repeat violations of the same citable provision of a standard in a preceding 15-month period. Only assessed violations that have been paid or finally adjudicated, or have become final orders of the Commission will be included in determining an operator's history. The repeat aspect of the history criterion in paragraph (c)(2) of this section applies only after an operator has received 10 violations or an independent contractor operator has received 6 violations.
(1)
Total number of violations. For mine operators, penalty points are assigned on the basis of the number of violations per inspection day (VPID)(Table VI). Penalty points are not assigned for mines with fewer than 10 violations in the specified history period. For independent contractors, penalty points are assigned on the basis of the total number of violations at all mines (Table VII). This aspect of the history criterion accounts for a maximum of 25 penalty points.
(2)
Repeat violations of the same standard. Repeat violation history is based on the number of violations of the same citable provision of a standard in a preceding 15-month period. For coal and metal and nonmetal mine operators with a minimum of six repeat violations, penalty points are assigned on the basis of the number of repeat violations per inspection day (RPID) (Table VIII). For independent contractors, penalty points are assigned on the basis of the number of violations at all mines (Table IX). This aspect of the history criterion accounts for a maximum of 20 penalty points (Table VIII).
(d)
Negligence.
Negligence is conduct, either by commission or omission, which falls below a standard of care established under the Mine Act to protect miners against the risks of harm. Under the Mine Act, an operator is held to a high standard of care. A mine operator is required to be on the alert for conditions and practices in the mine that affect the safety or health of miners and to take steps necessary to correct or prevent hazardous conditions or practices. The failure to exercise a high standard of care constitutes negligence. The negligence criterion assigns penalty points based on the degree to which the operator failed to exercise a high standard of care. When applying this criterion, MSHA considers mitigating circumstances which may include, but are not limited to, actions taken by the operator to prevent or correct hazardous conditions or practices. This criterion accounts for a maximum of 50 penalty points, based on conduct evaluated according to Table X.
(e)
Gravity.
Gravity is an evaluation of the seriousness of the violation. This criterion accounts for a maximum of 88 penalty points, as derived from the Tables XI through XIII. Gravity is determined by the likelihood of the occurrence of the event against which a standard is directed; the severity of the illness or injury if the event has occurred or was to occur; and the number of persons potentially affected if the event has occurred or were to occur.
(f)
Demonstrated good faith of the operator in abating the violation.
This criterion provides a 10% reduction in the penalty amount of a regular assessment where the operator abates the violation within the time set by the inspector.
(g)
Penalty conversion table.
The penalty conversion table is used to convert the total penalty points to a dollar amount.
Table 14 to Paragraph (g) - Penalty Conversion Table
Points
Penalty
($)
60 or fewer
$159
61
173
62
186
63
203
64
220
65
238
66
258
67
280
68
302
69
328
70
354
71
385
72
418
73
453
74
488
75
530
76
576
77
621
78
674
79
731
80
792
81
858
82
927
83
1,006
84
1,089
85
1,182
86
1,280
87
1,385
88
1,501
89
1,626
90
1,762
91
1,908
92
2,065
93
2,238
94
2,425
95
2,627
96
2,846
97
3,080
98
3,340
99
3,618
100
3,920
101
4,245
102
4,599
103
4,982
104
5,396
105
5,847
106
6,333
107
6,861
108
7,432
109
8,052
110
8,722
111
9,446
112
10,235
113
11,088
114
12,012
115
13,011
116
14,094
117
15,270
118
16,541
119
17,919
120
19,410
121
21,029
122
22,777
123
24,677
124
26,733
125
28,955
126
31,369
127
33,983
128
36,812
129
39,879
130
43,201
131
46,799
132
50,695
133
54,918
134
59,299
135
63,677
136
68,060
137
72,437
138
76,819
139
81,198
140 or more
85,580
(h)
The effect of the penalty on the operator's ability to continue in business. MSHA presumes that the operator's ability to continue in business will not be affected by the assessment of a civil penalty. The operator may, however, submit information to the District Manager concerning the financial status of the business. If the information provided by the operator indicates that the penalty will adversely affect the operator's ability to continue in business, the penalty may be reduced.
30 C.F.R. § 100.3
72 FR 13635, 3/22/2007, as amended at 73 FR 7209, 2/7/2008; 81 FR 43455, 7/1/2016; 82 FR 5383, 1/18/2017; 83 FR 14, 1/2/2018; 84 FR 219, 1/23/2019; 85 FR 2299, 1/15/2020; 86 FR 2970, 1/14/2021; 87 FR 2336, 1/14/2022; 88 FR 2218, 1/13/2023
72 FR 13635, 3/22/2007, as amended at 73 FR 7209, 2/7/2008; 81 FR 43455, 8/1/2016; 82 FR 5383, 1/18/2017; 83 FR 14, 1/2/2018; 84 FR 219, 1/23/2019; 85 FR 2299, 1/15/2020; 86 FR 2970, 1/14/2021; 87 FR 2336, 1/14/2022; 88 FR 2218, 1/13/2023
×