All
All
Parallel
Title
Appellant
Respondent
Lawyer
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant.
Let's chat.
Log in
Sign Up
Select Country
India
UK
&
Ireland
AMICUS AI
CaseIQ
Keyword Research
Parallel Search
Browse
Commentaries
Columns
My Project
New chat
Federal
U.S. Supreme Court
Federal Circuit
1st Circuit
2d Circuit
3d Circuit
4th Circuit
5th Circuit
6th Circuit
7th Circuit
8th Circuit
9th Circuit
10th Circuit
11th Circuit
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Board of Immigration Appeals
Special Courts
Bankruptcy
State
Alabama
Alaska
Arkansas
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District Of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Guam
Hawaii
Iowa
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Massachusetts
Maryland
Maine
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Mississippi
Montana
Nebraska
North Carolina
North Dakota
New Hampshire
New Jersey
Northern Mariana Islands
New Mexico
Nevada
New York
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Virginia
Vermont
Washington
Wisconsin
West Virginia
Wyoming
40 C.F.R. § 702.9 : Protection of Environment — ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY — TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT — GENERAL PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES — PROCEDURES FOR PRIORITIZATION OF CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES FOR RISK EVALUATION — Screening review and proposed priority designation
Text
(a)
Screening review.
Following the close of the comment period described in §702.7(d), including any extension pursuant to paragraph (e) of that section, EPA will generally use reasonably available information to screen the candidate chemical substance against the following criteria and considerations:
(1)
The chemical substance's hazard and exposure potential;
(2)
The chemical substance's persistence and bioaccumulation;
(3)
Potentially exposed or susceptible subpopulations;
(4)
Storage of the chemical substance near significant sources of drinking water;
(5)
The chemical substance's conditions of use or significant changes in conditions of use;
(6)
The chemical substance's production volume or significant changes in production volume; and
(7)
Other risk-based criteria that EPA determines to be relevant to the designation of the chemical substance's priority.
(b)
Information sources.
In conducting the screening review in paragraph (a) of this section, EPA expects to consider sources of information relevant to the listed criteria and consistent with the scientific standards provision in
15 U.S.C. 2625(h)
, including, as appropriate, sources for hazard and exposure data listed in Appendices A and B of the TSCA Work Plan Chemicals: Methods Document (February 2012).
(c)
Proposed designation.
Based on the results of the screening review in paragraph (a) of this section, relevant information received from the public as described in §702.7(d), and other information as appropriate and consistent with
15 U.S.C. 2625(h) and (i)
, EPA will propose to designate the chemical substance as either a High-Priority Substance or Low-Priority Substance, along with an identification of the information, analysis, and basis used to support the proposed designation.
(d)
Costs and non-risk factors.
EPA will not consider costs or other non-risk factors in making a proposed priority designation.
(e)
Insufficient information.
If information remains insufficient to enable the proposed designation of the chemical substance as a Low-Priority Substance after any extension of the initial public comment period pursuant to §702.7(e), EPA will propose to designate the chemical substance as a High-Priority Substance.
(f)
Conditions of use.
EPA will propose to designate a chemical substance as a High-Priority Substance based on the proposed conclusion that the chemical substance satisfies the definition of High-Priority Substance in §702.3 under one or more activities that the Agency determines constitute conditions of use. EPA will propose to designate a chemical substance as a Low-Priority Substance based on the proposed conclusion that the chemical substance meets the definition of Low-Priority Substance in §702.3 under the activities that the Agency determines constitute conditions of use.
(g)
Publication.
EPA will publish the proposed designation in the Federal Register, along with an identification of the information, analysis and basis used to support a proposed designation, in a form and manner that EPA deems appropriate, and provide a comment period of 90 days, during which time the public may submit comment on EPA's proposed designation. EPA will open a docket to facilitate receipt of public comment.
40 C.F.R. § 702.9
82 FR 33762, 9/18/2017
×