All
All
Parallel
Title
Appellant
Respondent
Lawyer
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant.
Let's chat.
Log in
Sign Up
Select Country
India
UK
&
Ireland
AMICUS AI
CaseIQ
Keyword Research
Parallel Search
Browse
Commentaries
Columns
My Project
New chat
Federal
U.S. Supreme Court
Federal Circuit
1st Circuit
2d Circuit
3d Circuit
4th Circuit
5th Circuit
6th Circuit
7th Circuit
8th Circuit
9th Circuit
10th Circuit
11th Circuit
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Board of Immigration Appeals
Special Courts
Bankruptcy
State
Alabama
Alaska
Arkansas
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District Of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Guam
Hawaii
Iowa
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Massachusetts
Maryland
Maine
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Mississippi
Montana
Nebraska
North Carolina
North Dakota
New Hampshire
New Jersey
Northern Mariana Islands
New Mexico
Nevada
New York
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Virginia
Vermont
Washington
Wisconsin
West Virginia
Wyoming
42 C.F.R. § 476.71 : Public Health — CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES — QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ORGANIZATIONS — QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ORGANIZATION REVIEW — REVIEW RESPONSIBILITIES OF QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ORGANIZATIONS (QIOS) —GENERAL PROVISIONS — QIO review requirements
Text
(a)
Scope of QIO review.
In its review, the QIO must determine (in accordance with the terms of its contract)-
(1)
Whether the services are or were reasonable and medically necessary for the diagnosis and treatment of illness or injury or to improve functioning of a malformed body member, or (with respect to pneumococcal vaccine) for prevention of illness or (in the case of hospice care) for the palliation and management of terminal illness;
(2)
Whether the quality of the services meets professionally recognized standards of health care;
(3)
Whether those services furnished or proposed to be furnished on an inpatient basis could, consistent with the provisions of appropriate medical care, be effectively furnished more economically on an outpatient basis or in an inpatient health care facility of a different type;
(4)
Through DRG validation, the validity of diagnostic and procedural information supplied by the hospital;
(5)
The completeness, adequacy and quality of hospital care provided;
(6)
The medical necessity, reasonableness and appropriateness of hospital admissions and discharges;
(7)
The medical necessity, reasonableness and appropriateness of inpatient hospital care for which additional payment is sought under the outlier provisions of §§412.82 and 412.84 of this chapter; and
(8)
Whether a hospital has misrepresented admission or discharge information or has taken an action that results in-
(i)
The unnecessary admission of an individual entitled to benefits under part A;
(ii)
Unnecessary multiple admissions of an individual; or
(iii)
Other inappropriate medical or other practices with respect to beneficiaries or billing for services furnished to beneficiaries.
(b)
Payment determinations.
On the basis of the review specified under paragraphs (a) (1), (3), (6), (7), and (8) of this section, the QIO must determine whether payment may be made for these services. A QIO may grant a period of not more than two days (grace days) for the purpose of arranging post discharge care when the provider did not know or could not reasonably be expected to have known that payment for the service(s) would not be made under the Medicare program as specified in §405.330(b).
(c)
Other duties and functions.
(1)
The QIO must review at least a random sample of hospital discharges each quarter and submit new diagnostic and procedural information to the Medicare fiscal intermediary or carrier if it determines that the information submitted by the hospital was incorrect.
(2)
As directed by CMS, the QIO must review changes in DRG and LTC-DRG assignments made by the intermediary under the provisions of §§412.60(d) and 412.513(c) of this chapter that result in the assignment of a higher-weighted DRG or a different LTC-DRG. The QIO's review must verify that the diagnostic and procedural information supplied by the hospital is substantiated by the information in the medical record.
(d)
Coordination of sanction activities.
The QIO must carry out the responsibilities specified in subpart C of part 1004 of this title regarding imposition of sanctions on providers and practitioners who violate their statutory obligations under section 1156 of the Act.
42 C.F.R. §476.71
52 FR 37457, 10/7/1987; 52 FR 47003, 12/11/1987, as amended at 59 FR 45402, 9/1/1994. Redesignated at 64 FR 66279, 11/24/1999; 67 FR 56056, 8/30/2002; 77 FR 68560, 11/15/2012
×