All
All
Parallel
Title
Appellant
Respondent
Lawyer
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant.
Let's chat.
Log in
Sign Up
Select Country
India
UK
&
Ireland
AMICUS AI
CaseIQ
Keyword Research
Parallel Search
Browse
Commentaries
Columns
My Project
New chat
Federal
U.S. Supreme Court
Federal Circuit
1st Circuit
2d Circuit
3d Circuit
4th Circuit
5th Circuit
6th Circuit
7th Circuit
8th Circuit
9th Circuit
10th Circuit
11th Circuit
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Board of Immigration Appeals
Special Courts
Bankruptcy
State
Alabama
Alaska
Arkansas
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District Of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Guam
Hawaii
Iowa
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Massachusetts
Maryland
Maine
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Mississippi
Montana
Nebraska
North Carolina
North Dakota
New Hampshire
New Jersey
Northern Mariana Islands
New Mexico
Nevada
New York
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Virginia
Vermont
Washington
Wisconsin
West Virginia
Wyoming
29 C.F.R. § 785.22 : Labor — REGULATIONS RELATING TO LABOR — WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR — STATEMENTS OF GENERAL POLICY OR INTERPRETATION NOT DIRECTLY RELATED TO REGULATIONS — HOURS WORKED — APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES —SLEEPING TIME AND CERTAIN OTHER ACTIVITIES — Duty of 24 hours or more
Text
(a)
General.
Where an employee is required to be on duty for 24 hours or more, the employer and the employee may agree to exclude bona fide meal periods and a bona fide regularly scheduled sleeping period of not more than 8 hours from hours worked, provided adequate sleeping facilities are furnished by the employer and the employee can usually enjoy an uninterrupted night's sleep. If sleeping period is of more than 8 hours, only 8 hours will be credited. Where no expressed or implied agreement to the contrary is present, the 8 hours of sleeping time and lunch periods constitute hours worked. (
Armour
v.
Wantock,
323 U.S. 126(1944);
Skidmore
v.
Swift,
323 U.S. 134(1944);
General Electric Co.
v.
Porter,
208 F. 2d 805 (C.A. 9, 1953), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 951, 975(1954);
Bowers
v.
Remington Rand,
64 F. Supp. 620 (S.D. Ill, 1946), aff'd 159 F. 2d 114 (C.A. 7, 1946) cert. denied 330 U.S. 843(1947);
Bell
v.
Porter,
159 F. 2d 117 (C.A. 7, 1946) cert. denied 330 U.S. 813(1947);
Bridgeman
v.
Ford, Bacon & Davis,
161 F. 2d 962 (C.A. 8, 1947);
Rokey
v.
Day & Zimmerman,
157 F. 2d 736 (C.A. 8, 1946);
McLaughlin
v.
Todd & Brown, Inc.,
7 W.H. Cases 1014; 15 Labor Cases para. 64,606 (N.D. Ind. 1948);
Campbell
v.
Jones & Laughlin,
70 F. Supp. 996 (W.D. Pa. 1947).)
(b)
Interruptions of sleep.
If the sleeping period is interrupted by a call to duty, the interruption must be counted as hours worked. If the period is interrupted to such an extent that the employee cannot get a reasonable night's sleep, the entire period must be counted. For enforcement purposes, the Divisons have adopted the rule that if the employee cannot get at least 5 hours' sleep during the scheduled period the entire time is working time. (See
Eustice
v.
Federal Cartridge Corp.,
66 F. Supp. 55 (D. Minn. 1946).)
29 C.F.R. § 785.22
×