All
All
Parallel
Title
Appellant
Respondent
Lawyer
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant.
Let's chat.
Log in
Sign Up
Select Country
India
UK
&
Ireland
AMICUS AI
CaseIQ
Keyword Research
Parallel Search
Browse
Commentaries
Columns
My Project
New chat
Federal
U.S. Supreme Court
Federal Circuit
1st Circuit
2d Circuit
3d Circuit
4th Circuit
5th Circuit
6th Circuit
7th Circuit
8th Circuit
9th Circuit
10th Circuit
11th Circuit
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Board of Immigration Appeals
Special Courts
Bankruptcy
State
Alabama
Alaska
Arkansas
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District Of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Guam
Hawaii
Iowa
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Massachusetts
Maryland
Maine
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Mississippi
Montana
Nebraska
North Carolina
North Dakota
New Hampshire
New Jersey
Northern Mariana Islands
New Mexico
Nevada
New York
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Virginia
Vermont
Washington
Wisconsin
West Virginia
Wyoming
803 Mass. Reg. 1.04 : — DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFORMATION SERVICESSex Offender Registry Board, Registration, Classification and Dissemination — Registration and Classification Process
Text
(1)
Preamble
. Pursuant to M.G.L. c. 6, § 178K(1), the Board is required to publish guidelines for determining each sex offender's level of risk of reoffense and degree of dangerousness posed to the public, or for relief from the obligation of registration. Pursuant to M.G.L. c. 6, § 178K(1) and (2), these guidelines shall provide for three levels of notification based on a sex offender's risk of reoffense and degree of dangerousness. The offender's final classification level determines the amount of information that can be disseminated about him or her to the public through the notification procedures, pursuant to M.G.L. c. 6, §§ 178C through 178Q. The registration and classification process is a two stage process.
(2)
In the first stage, the Board makes a recommendation regarding each sex offender's duty to register and classification level pursuant to M.G.L. c. 6, § 178L. During the recommendation process, the sex offender is entitled to present documentary evidence for the Board to consider. The sex offender will be notified in writing of the Board's recommendation. The sex offender may either accept or reject the recommendation. The recommendation process is set forth at
803 CMR 1.06
through
1.08
. If the sex offender accepts the Board's recommendation, then the recommended classification level shall become final and is not subject to judicial review, pursuant to M.G.L. c. 30A.
(3)
If the sex offender rejects the Board's recommendation, the process moves into the second stage which is set forth at
803 CMR 1.09
through
1.22
. The sex offender is provided with a
de novo
hearing at which all relevant evidence is evaluated by a Hearing Examiner to reach a final decision regarding the sex offender's duty to register and final classification level. The Hearing Examiner shall base his or her decision on the totality of all the relevant evidence introduced at the sex offender's individualized hearing. The final agency decision issued by the Hearing Examiner is subject to judicial review in the Superior Court, pursuant to M.G. L. c. 30A.
(4)
Factors
. M.G.L. c. 6, §§ 178K(2) and 178L(1), sets forth criteria to be considered by the Board in determining risk of reoffense and degree of dangerousness and authorize the Board to identify and utilize additional risk factors and criteria not specifically listed in the statute. Based on this statutory authority, the Board created
803 CMR 1.33
which describes and defines the factors that the Board shall consider in making all registration and classification decisions. In determining the final classification, the Hearing Examiner shall be guided by the definitions, explanations, principles, and authorities contained in the Factors set forth in
803 CMR 1.33
and shall not be bound by the Board's recommendations.
803 CMR 1.04
Amended by Mass Register Issue 1305, eff. 1/29/2016.
Amended by Mass Register Issue 1306, eff. 1/29/2016.
×