All
All
Parallel
Title
Appellant
Respondent
Lawyer
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant.
Let's chat.
Log in
Sign Up
Select Country
India
UK
&
Ireland
AMICUS AI
CaseIQ
Keyword Research
Parallel Search
Browse
Commentaries
Columns
My Project
New chat
Federal
U.S. Supreme Court
Federal Circuit
1st Circuit
2d Circuit
3d Circuit
4th Circuit
5th Circuit
6th Circuit
7th Circuit
8th Circuit
9th Circuit
10th Circuit
11th Circuit
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Board of Immigration Appeals
Special Courts
Bankruptcy
State
Alabama
Alaska
Arkansas
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District Of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Guam
Hawaii
Iowa
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Massachusetts
Maryland
Maine
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Mississippi
Montana
Nebraska
North Carolina
North Dakota
New Hampshire
New Jersey
Northern Mariana Islands
New Mexico
Nevada
New York
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Virginia
Vermont
Washington
Wisconsin
West Virginia
Wyoming
803 Mass. Reg. 1.06 : — DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFORMATION SERVICESSex Offender Registry Board, Registration, Classification and Dissemination — Duty to Register and Recommended Classification Level
Text
(1)
Duty to Register
. Pursuant to M.G.L. c. 6, §§ 178C, 178K(2) and 178L(1), the Board shall determine whether a sex offender has a duty to register and, if so, shall then prepare a recommended classification of the sex offender as a Level 1, Level 2, or Level 3 offender.
(2)
No Duty to Register
. If the Board determines that the offender does not have a duty to register, it shall notify the offender in writing. The Board shall promptly remove information pertaining to the offender from the sex offender registry.
(3)
Recommended Classification
. If the Board determines that the offender does have a duty to register, the Board shall prepare a recommended classification level based on the factors enumerated in M.G.L. c. 6, § 178K(1)(a) through (l) and further explained at
803 CMR 1.33
. Pursuant to M.G.L. c. 6, § 178L(1), in preparing the recommended classification level, the Board shall consider any relevant materials, including documentary evidence submitted by the sex offender. A staff member of the Board shall complete the classification worksheet based on this information.
(4)
Written Approval by Board Member
. Pursuant to M.G.L. c. 6, § 178L(1), the classification worksheet shall be reviewed by one Board member, who shall enter written findings and determine the recommended classification level. The Board member who made the recommendation shall not be subject to a subpoena nor shall his or her mental process in reaching the recommended classification level be otherwise probed, as the recommendation may be appealed at a
de novo
hearing.
(5)
Juvenile Recommendations
.
(a)
If the sex offender was a juvenile at the time of the sex offense, the written findings and recommended classification level made pursuant to 803 CMR 1.06(4) shall be completed by the Board member who is a licensed psychologist or psychiatrist with special expertise in the assessment and evaluation of juvenile sex offenders.
(b)
To prepare a recommended classification for a juvenile or an adult whose only sex offense(s) was committed as a juvenile, the Board may meet with the juvenile sex offender. If the Board chooses to meet with the juvenile sex offender, he or she is permitted to be represented by his or her authorized representative. The Board shall not draw any adverse inferences from an offender's refusal or failure to meet with the Board.
(6)
A Board member shall not preside at the classification hearing in a case where he or she made written findings and determined the recommended classification level pursuant to 803 CMR 1.06(4), except in the case of a juvenile sex offender or an adult sex offender whose only sex offense(s) was committed as a juvenile. In these circumstances, the Board member who is a licensed psychologist or psychiatrist with expertise in juvenile sex offenders may complete the recommended classification pursuant to 803 CMR 1.06(4) and also preside at the classification hearing with the consent of the juvenile.
(7)
The Board member who made the written findings and determined the recommended classification level pursuant to 803 CMR 1.06(4) shall not be prohibited from participating in any sexually violent predator recommendation made pursuant to M.G.L. c. 6, § 178K(2)(c), or any motion to terminate registration obligation pursuant to
803 CMR 1.30
, or any request to reclassify pursuant to
803 CMR 1.31
.
803 CMR 1.06
Amended by Mass Register Issue 1305, eff. 1/29/2016.
×