All
All
Parallel
Title
Appellant
Respondent
Lawyer
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant.
Let's chat.
Log in
Sign Up
Select Country
India
UK
&
Ireland
AMICUS AI
CaseIQ
Keyword Research
Parallel Search
Browse
Commentaries
Columns
My Project
New chat
Federal
U.S. Supreme Court
Federal Circuit
1st Circuit
2d Circuit
3d Circuit
4th Circuit
5th Circuit
6th Circuit
7th Circuit
8th Circuit
9th Circuit
10th Circuit
11th Circuit
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Board of Immigration Appeals
Special Courts
Bankruptcy
State
Alabama
Alaska
Arkansas
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District Of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Guam
Hawaii
Iowa
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Massachusetts
Maryland
Maine
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Mississippi
Montana
Nebraska
North Carolina
North Dakota
New Hampshire
New Jersey
Northern Mariana Islands
New Mexico
Nevada
New York
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Virginia
Vermont
Washington
Wisconsin
West Virginia
Wyoming
W. Va. Code R. § 60-5-4 : Environmental Protection - Secretary's Office — INTERPRETIVE RULE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, SECRETARY'S OFFICE —05 - Antidegradation Implementation Procedures —5-4 - Tier 1 Protection
Text
4.1.
Existing uses and the level of water quality necessary to protect the existing uses shall be maintained and protected.
4.2.
Tier 1 protection applies to all waters of the state. A water segment shall be afforded Tier 1 protection where the level of water quality is not sufficient to support recreation and wildlife and the propagation and maintenance of fish and other aquatic life, or where the water quality meets but does not exceed levels necessary to support recreation and wildlife and the propagation and maintenance of fish and other aquatic life.
4.3.
In determining whether a water segment is afforded only Tier 1 protection, the agency will focus on whether the water segment is meeting or failing to meet minimum uses.
4.4.
The Secretary will consider whether a water segment is listed on the state's 303(d) impaired waters list, but where the parameter(s) for which the water segment is listed does not result in that water segment's failure to attain minimum uses and where all other parameters exceed the quality necessary to support recreation and wildlife and the propagation and maintenance of fish and other aquatic life, the water segment will be afforded Tier 2 protection. Where the parameter(s) for which the water segment is listed does result in failure to attain minimum uses, such as an acid mine drainage-impacted water segment, that water segment will be afforded only Tier 1 protection.
4.5.
All water segments listed on the state's 303(d) impaired waters list will be afforded only Tier 1 protection for the parameter(s) that resulted in the water segment being listed.
4.6.
There also may be waters in the state where one or both of the fishable/swimmable uses are attained, but existing water quality is not "better than necessary" to support those uses (i.e., assimilative capacity does not exist for any of the parameters that would be affected by the proposed activity). Tier 1 protection is appropriate for such a water segment.
4.7.
Where existing uses of the water body are impaired, there shall be no lowering of the water quality with respect to the parameters of concern that are causing the impairment. The agency shall consider nomination of such water body for the 303(d) list of water quality-impaired streams.
4.8.
Where a proposed activity will result in a new or expanded discharge that would otherwise prevent attainment of an existing use in a water subject to Tier 1 protection, the applicant may be allowed to satisfy antidegradation review requirements by implementing or financing upstream controls of point or nonpoint sources sufficient to offset the water quality effects of the proposed activity from the same parameters and insure an improvement in water quality as a result of the trade. The basis of the trade will be documented and will be consistent with the trading assessment procedure that has been approved by the Secretary. A trade may be made between more than one stream segment where removing a discharge in one stream segment directly results in improved water quality in another stream segment. In addition, (1) the effluent trade must be for the same parameter; (2) where uncertainty exists regarding the effluent trade, an adequate margin of safety will be required; (3) dischargers cannot claim offsets for water quality improvements that are required or will occur irrespective of the proposed new or expanded discharge; and (4) the trade must be enforceable.
W. Va. Code R. § 60-5-4
×