All
All
Parallel
Title
Appellant
Respondent
Lawyer
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant.
Let's chat.
Log in
Sign Up
Select Country
India
UK
&
Ireland
AMICUS AI
CaseIQ
Keyword Research
Parallel Search
Browse
Commentaries
Columns
My Project
New chat
Federal
U.S. Supreme Court
Federal Circuit
1st Circuit
2d Circuit
3d Circuit
4th Circuit
5th Circuit
6th Circuit
7th Circuit
8th Circuit
9th Circuit
10th Circuit
11th Circuit
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Board of Immigration Appeals
Special Courts
Bankruptcy
State
Alabama
Alaska
Arkansas
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District Of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Guam
Hawaii
Iowa
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Massachusetts
Maryland
Maine
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Mississippi
Montana
Nebraska
North Carolina
North Dakota
New Hampshire
New Jersey
Northern Mariana Islands
New Mexico
Nevada
New York
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Virginia
Vermont
Washington
Wisconsin
West Virginia
Wyoming
N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 15 § 124.4 : Department of Motor Vehicles — REGULATIONS OF THE COMMISSIONER — Administrative Adjudication Of Traffic Violations — Hearings — Conduct of hearing; procedure; recusal
Text
(a)
The administrative law judge will call the police officer, the motorist, and the attorney or other representative, if any, to the dais. After the charge is read, the police officer will testify. The burden of proving the charge rests with the police officer, who has the obligation to present evidence which is sufficient to establish each material element of the charge by clear and convincing evidence. Other testimony in support of the charge may then be given.
(b)
The administrative law judge may question the police officer for the purpose of clarifying evidence already presented; leading questions addressed to material elements of the charge which have been omitted from the police officer's testimony may not be asked.
(c)
After the people's case has been presented, the motorist may then testify on his or her own behalf and call witnesses. Any person who testifies may be examined by the administrative law judge and cross- examined by the adverse party. All testimony shall be given under oath or affirmation. The administrative law judge may exclude any witness, except the motorist or police officer, during the testimony of another person. Documentary evidence may be introduced by any party.
(d)
When the administrative law judge has received all of the evidence, the police officer and motorist or his or her representative may make a closing statement. The administrative law judge will then consider all the evidence in the record and announce whether or not the charge has been sustained by clear and convincing evidence.
(e)
The motorist may request recusal of a presiding administrative law judge. The request and the reason for it must be stated to the presiding administrative law judge at the commencement of the hearing or as soon after the beginning as the motorist receives information which forms the basis for such request. An administrative law judge's denial of a request for recusal is appealable provided a hearing determination is subsequently made which is appealable by the requestor to the Traffic Violations Appeals Board pursuant to article 2-A of the Vehicle and Traffic Law.
N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. Tit. 15 § 124.4
×