All
All
Parallel
Title
Appellant
Respondent
Lawyer
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant.
Let's chat.
Log in
Sign Up
Select Country
India
UK
&
Ireland
AMICUS AI
CaseIQ
Keyword Research
Parallel Search
Browse
Commentaries
Columns
My Project
New chat
Federal
U.S. Supreme Court
Federal Circuit
1st Circuit
2d Circuit
3d Circuit
4th Circuit
5th Circuit
6th Circuit
7th Circuit
8th Circuit
9th Circuit
10th Circuit
11th Circuit
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Board of Immigration Appeals
Special Courts
Bankruptcy
State
Alabama
Alaska
Arkansas
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District Of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Guam
Hawaii
Iowa
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Massachusetts
Maryland
Maine
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Mississippi
Montana
Nebraska
North Carolina
North Dakota
New Hampshire
New Jersey
Northern Mariana Islands
New Mexico
Nevada
New York
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Virginia
Vermont
Washington
Wisconsin
West Virginia
Wyoming
37 C.F.R. § 1.560 : Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights — UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE — GENERAL — RULES OF PRACTICE IN PATENT CASES — EX PARTE REEXAMINATION OF PATENTS —EX PARTE REEXAMINATION — Interviews in ex parte reexamination proceedings
Text
(a)
Interviews in
ex parte
reexamination proceedings pending before the Office between examiners and the owners of such patents or their attorneys or agents of record must be conducted in the Office at such times, within Office hours, as the respective examiners may designate. Interviews will not be permitted at any other time or place without the authority of the Director. Interviews for the discussion of the patentability of claims in patents involved in
ex parte
reexamination proceedings will not be conducted prior to the first official action. Interviews should be arranged in advance. Requests that reexamination requesters participate in interviews with examiners will not be granted.
(b)
In every instance of an interview with an examiner in an
ex parte
reexamination proceeding, a complete written statement of the reasons presented at the interview as warranting favorable action must be filed by the patent owner. An interview does not remove the necessity for response to Office actions as specified in §1.111. Patent owner's response to an outstanding Office action after the interview does not remove the necessity for filing the written statement. The written statement must be filed as a separate part of a response to an Office action outstanding at the time of the interview, or as a separate paper within one month from the date of the interview, whichever is later.
37 C.F.R. §1.560
65 FR 76777, 12/7/2000
×