All
All
Parallel
Title
Appellant
Respondent
Lawyer
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant.
Let's chat.
Log in
Sign Up
Select Country
India
UK
&
Ireland
AMICUS AI
CaseIQ
Keyword Research
Parallel Search
Browse
Commentaries
Columns
My Project
New chat
Federal
U.S. Supreme Court
Federal Circuit
1st Circuit
2d Circuit
3d Circuit
4th Circuit
5th Circuit
6th Circuit
7th Circuit
8th Circuit
9th Circuit
10th Circuit
11th Circuit
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Board of Immigration Appeals
Special Courts
Bankruptcy
State
Alabama
Alaska
Arkansas
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District Of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Guam
Hawaii
Iowa
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Massachusetts
Maryland
Maine
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Mississippi
Montana
Nebraska
North Carolina
North Dakota
New Hampshire
New Jersey
Northern Mariana Islands
New Mexico
Nevada
New York
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Virginia
Vermont
Washington
Wisconsin
West Virginia
Wyoming
37 C.F.R. § 1.565 : Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights — UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE — GENERAL — RULES OF PRACTICE IN PATENT CASES — EX PARTE REEXAMINATION OF PATENTS —EX PARTE REEXAMINATION — Concurrent office proceedings which include an ex parte reexamination proceeding
Text
(a)
In an
ex parte
reexamination proceeding before the Office, the patent owner must inform the Office of any prior or concurrent proceedings in which the patent is or was involved such as interferences, reissues,
ex parte
reexaminations,
inter partes
reexaminations, or litigation and the results of such proceedings. See §1.985 for notification of prior or concurrent proceedings in an
inter partes
reexamination proceeding.
(b)
If a patent in the process of
ex parte
reexamination is or becomes involved in litigation, the Director shall determine whether or not to suspend the reexamination. See §1.987 for
inter partes
reexamination proceedings.
(c)
If
ex parte
reexamination is ordered while a prior
ex parte
reexamination proceeding is pending and prosecution in the prior
ex parte
reexamination proceeding has not been terminated, the
ex parte
reexamination proceedings will usually be merged and result in the issuance and publication of a single certificate under §1.570. For merger of
inter partes
reexamination proceedings, see §1.989(a). For merger of
ex parte
reexamination and
inter partes
reexamination proceedings, see §1.989(b).
(d)
If a reissue application and an
ex parte
reexamination proceeding on which an order pursuant to §1.525 has been mailed are pending concurrently on a patent, a decision will usually be made to merge the two proceedings or to suspend one of the two proceedings. Where merger of a reissue application and an
ex parte
reexamination proceeding is ordered, the merged examination will be conducted in accordance with §§1.171 through 1.179, and the patent owner will be required to place and maintain the same claims in the reissue application and the
ex parte
reexamination proceeding during the pendency of the merged proceeding. The examiner's actions and responses by the patent owner in a merged proceeding will apply to both the reissue application and the
ex parte
reexamination proceeding and will be physically entered into both files. Any
ex parte
reexamination proceeding merged with a reissue application shall be concluded by the grant of the reissued patent. For merger of a reissue application and an
inter partes
reexamination, see §1.991.
(e)
If a patent in the process of
ex parte
reexamination is or becomes involved in an interference, the Director may suspend the reexamination or the interference. The Director will not consider a request to suspend an interference unless a motion (§41.121(a)(3) of this title) to suspend the interference has been presented to, and denied by, an administrative patent judge, and the request is filed within ten (10) days of a decision by an administrative patent judge denying the motion for suspension or such other time as the administrative patent judge may set. For concurrent
inter partes
reexamination and interference of a patent, see §1.993.
37 C.F.R. §1.565
65 FR 76776, 12/7/2000, as amended at 69 FR 50001, 8/12/2004; 72 FR 18905, 4/16/2007
×