All
All
Parallel
Title
Appellant
Respondent
Lawyer
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant.
Let's chat.
Log in
Sign Up
Select Country
India
UK
&
Ireland
AMICUS AI
CaseIQ
Keyword Research
Parallel Search
Browse
Commentaries
Columns
My Project
New chat
Federal
U.S. Supreme Court
Federal Circuit
1st Circuit
2d Circuit
3d Circuit
4th Circuit
5th Circuit
6th Circuit
7th Circuit
8th Circuit
9th Circuit
10th Circuit
11th Circuit
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Board of Immigration Appeals
Special Courts
Bankruptcy
State
Alabama
Alaska
Arkansas
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District Of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Guam
Hawaii
Iowa
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Massachusetts
Maryland
Maine
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Mississippi
Montana
Nebraska
North Carolina
North Dakota
New Hampshire
New Jersey
Northern Mariana Islands
New Mexico
Nevada
New York
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Virginia
Vermont
Washington
Wisconsin
West Virginia
Wyoming
37 C.F.R. § 1.510 : Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights — UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE — GENERAL — RULES OF PRACTICE IN PATENT CASES — EX PARTE REEXAMINATION OF PATENTS —REQUEST FOR EX PARTE REEXAMINATION — Request for ex parte reexamination
Text
(a)
Any person may, at any time during the period of enforceability of a patent, file a request for an
ex parte
reexamination by the Office of any claim of the patent on the basis of prior art patents or printed publications cited under §1.501, unless prohibited by
35 U.S.C. 315(e)(1)
or
35 U.S.C. 325(e)(1)
. The request must be accompanied by the fee for requesting reexamination set in §1.20(c)(1).
(b)
Any request for reexamination must include the following parts:
(1)
A statement pointing out each substantial new question of patentability based on prior patents and printed publications.
(2)
An identification of every claim for which reexamination is requested, and a detailed explanation of the pertinency and manner of applying the cited prior art to every claim for which reexamination is requested. For each statement of the patent owner and accompanying information submitted pursuant to §1.501(a)(2) which is relied upon in the detailed explanation, the request must explain how that statement is being used to determine the proper meaning of a patent claim in connection with the prior art applied to that claim and how each relevant claim is being interpreted. If appropriate, the party requesting reexamination may also point out how claims distinguish over cited prior art.
(3)
A copy of every patent or printed publication relied upon or referred to in paragraph (b) (1) and (2) of this section accompanied by an English language translation of all the necessary and pertinent parts of any non-English language patent or printed publication.
(4)
A copy of the entire patent including the front face, drawings, and specification/claims (in double column format) for which reexamination is requested, and a copy of any disclaimer, certificate of correction, or reexamination certificate issued in the patent. All copies must have each page plainly written on only one side of a sheet of paper.
(5)
A certification that a copy of the request filed by a person other than the patent owner has been served in its entirety on the patent owner at the address as provided for in §1.33(c). The name and address of the party served must be indicated. If service was not possible, a duplicate copy must be supplied to the Office.
(6)
A certification by the third party requester that the statutory estoppel provisions of
35 U.S.C. 315(e)(1)
or
35 U.S.C. 325(e)(1)
do not prohibit the requester from filing the
ex parte
reexamination request.
(c)
If the request does not include the fee for requesting
ex parte
reexamination required by paragraph (a) of this section and meet all the requirements by paragraph (b) of this section, then the person identified as requesting reexamination will be so notified and will generally be given an opportunity to complete the request within a specified time. Failure to comply with the notice will result in the
ex parte
reexamination request not being granted a filing date, and will result in placement of the request in the patent file as a citation if it complies with the requirements of §1.501.
(d)
The filing date of the request for
ex parte
reexamination is the date on which the request satisfies all the requirements of this section.
(e)
A request filed by the patent owner may include a proposed amendment in accordance with §1.530.
(f)
If a request is filed by an attorney or agent identifying another party on whose behalf the request is being filed, the attorney or agent must have a power of attorney from that party or be acting in a representative capacity pursuant to §1.34.
37 C.F.R. §1.510
35 U.S.C. 6
;
15 U.S.C. 1113
,
1123
46 FR 29185, 5/29/1981, as amended at 47 FR 41282, 9/17/1982; 62 FR 53200, 10/10/1997; 65 FR 54678, 9/8/2000; 65 FR 76775, Dec 7, 2000; 71 FR 9262, 2/23/2006; 71 FR 44223, 8/4/2006; 72 FR 18905, 4/16/2007; 77 FR 46626, 8/6/2012
×