Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

In the Matter of Hyacinth L. King, respondent, v. Merlon Haynes, appellant.

Unpublished Opinion

MOTION DECISION

M289805

HECTOR D. LASALLE, P.J., MARK C. DILLON, COLLEEN D. DUFFY, BETSY BARROS, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated June 14, 2023.

On the Court's own motion, it is

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that no appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of the appealing party (see CPLR 5511).

LASALLE, P.J., DILLON, DUFFY, BARROS and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

King v. Haynes
(Jul 3, 2023)