AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY v. BUCHANAN HAULING & RIGGING, INC.

ANDREW S. HANEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION

ANDREW S. HANEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pending before the Court in the above referenced proceeding are the Defendant's Amended Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 23); Plaintiffs Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion for Partial summary Judgment (Doc. No. 26); and Judge Sheldon's Memorandum and Recommendation (Doc. No. 32) that the Court grant Defendant's motion and deny Plaintiffs Motion. No objections were filed by either party and the time for doing so has passed.

Upon review, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's conclusions. Accordingly, the Court hereby

ORDERS that the Memorandum and Recommendation (Doc. No. 32) is ADOPTED. Defendant's Amended Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 23) is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 26) is DENIED.

Plaintiffs case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Entry of this Order shall constitute entry of Final Judgment.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

The Dow Chem. Co. v. Buchanan Hauling & Rigging, Inc.
(Nov 29, 2022)