Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

Lincoln Lane ADDLEMAN, Jr., Plaintiff/Appellant v. Amos E. REED, W.L. Kautzky, James C. Spalding, Daniel Pinkney, Lawrence Kincheloe, Warden, Defendants/Appellees.

920 F.2d 936 (9th Cir. 1990) Lincoln Lane ADDLEMAN, Jr., Plaintiff/Appellant v. Amos E. REED, W.L. Kautzky, James C. Spalding, Daniel Pinkney, Lawrence Kincheloe, Warden, Defendants/Appellees. No. 87-3897. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit December 3, 1990

Editorial Note:

This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA9 Rule 36-3 regarding use of unpublished opinions)

Decided Dec. 7, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Washington; Robert J. McNichols, District Judge, Presiding.

E.D.Wash.

AFFIRMED.

Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, and EUGENE A. WRIGHT and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Cir.R. 36-3.

There is no ground for relief under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) alleged by the Petitioner. See Tomlin v. McDaniel, 865 F.2d 209, 210 (9th Cir.1989). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Addleman v. Reed
(Dec 3, 1990)