a) The United States has represented that the discovery associated with this case includes eighty-eight pages of paper discovery and fifty CDs containing audio and video recordings. All of this discovery has been produced directly to counsel.
b) Counsel for defendants desire additional time consult with their clients, review the discovery produced in this case, investigate the case, and discuss potential resolution of this matter with the United States.
c) Counsel for defendants believe that failure to grant the above-requested continuance would deny them the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
d) The United States does not object to the continuance.
e) Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendants in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act.
f) For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act,
18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of July 24, 2014 to September 18, 2014, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to
18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendants' request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.
4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
FINDINGS AND ORDER
IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED.