Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Clark Stenbak, Defendant and Appellant

Per Curiam.

Appeal from the District Court of Mountrail County, North Central Judicial District, the Honorable Richard L. Hagar, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. Wade G. Enget, Mountrail County State's Attorney, Stanley, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Clark Stenbak appeals from a criminal judgment after a jury found him guilty of menacing and preventing arrest. Stenbak argues insufficient evidence was presented to sustain his convictions. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, we conclude sufficient evidence exists that could allow a jury to draw a reasonable inference in favor of the convictions. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte

Lisa Fair McEvers

Gerald W. VandeWalle

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

State v. Stenbak
(Jun 2, 2020)