Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Petitioner v. CARLOS PEREZ, Respondent

PER CURIAM

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court ORDER PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of March, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court misapply the standard for the evidentiary sufficiency of the Commonwealth's prima facie case, as set forth by this Court in Commonwealth v. Karetny, 880 A.2d 505, 528 (Pa. 2005) and Commonwealth v. Huggins, 836 A.2d 862, 866 (Pa. 2003), effectively ruling that inferences may be drawn from the evidence in favor of defendant[s] at the preliminary hearing stage of a criminal proceeding and raising the burden of proof borne by the Commonwealth?

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Commonwealth v. Perez
(Mar 2, 2020)