AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

Dr. Da v. d S. MURANSKY, indi

Scott D. Owens, Patrick Christopher Crotty, Scott D. Owens, PA, Hollywood, FL, Michael S. Hilicki, Keith J. Keogh, Keogh Law, LTD, Chicago, IL, Bret Leon Lusskin, Jr., Bret Lusskin, PA, Aventura, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

David S. Almeida, Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff, LLP, Chicago, IL, Brian Melendez, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Charles Philip Flick, Shawn Y. Libman, Bowman & Brooke, LLP, CORAL GABLES, FL, Linda M. Reck, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Orlando, FL, Michele L. Stocker, Greenberg Traurig, PA, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Defendant-Appellee.

John W. Davis, Law Office of John W. Davis, Tampa, FL, C. Benjamin Nutley, Pasadena, CA, Eric Alan Isaacson, Law Office of Eric Alan Isaacson, La Jolla, CA, for Interested Party-Appellant ERIC ALAN ISAACSON.

Jonathan S. Franklin, Peter B. Siegal, Norton Rose Fulbright US, LLP, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae SIX FLAGS ENTERTAINMENT CORP.

Kevin Brent Huff, Jeremy Samuel Bloch Newman, Kellogg Hansen Todd Figel & Frederick, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Amici Curiae NATIONAL RETAIL FEDERATION, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNATIONAL FRANCHISE ASSOCIATION.

Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, MARCUS, WILSON, WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN, JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, NEWSOM, BRANCH, and GRANT, Circuit Judges :

Judge Jill Pryor, having recused herself, did not participate in the poll.
--------

A petition for rehearing en banc having been filed, a member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard en banc, and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc, it is ORDERED that this case will be reheard en banc. The panel’s opinion is VACATED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc.
(Oct 4, 2019)