AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

In re Jason E. ANDERSON; Erica L. Anderson, Debtors. Ruth A. Slone, Chapter 7 Trustee, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Jason E. Anderson, et al., Defendants–Appellants.

GEORGE W. EMERSON

Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Ohio at Dayton. Case No. 10–30064; Adv. No. 10–3361.
ON BRIEF:
Tyler W. Kahler, Law Office of Joseph C. Lucas, LLC, Canton, OH, for Appellants. Harry B. Zornow, Hamilton, OH, for Appellees.
Before: EMERSON, HARRISON, and LLOYD, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judges.


OPINION


GEORGE W. EMERSON, JR., Bankruptcy Judge.


The issue before the Panel on appeal is whether the bankruptcy court erred in avoiding the transfer of $74,102.60 to 1st National Cash Refund pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 549 and ordering recovery of transferred property from 1st National Cash Refund and Carl Woodford pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 550. After reviewing the record, the parties' briefs, and applicable law, the Panel concludes that the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the statutes of limitation found in 11 U.S.C. § 549 and 11 U.S.C. § 550 were equitably tolled and that the bankruptcy court properly found that the trustee had power to avoid and recover the transferred property. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the bankruptcy court's thorough and well-reasoned opinion entered on September 9, 2013, Ruth A. Slone v. Jason E. Anderson, et al., (In re Anderson), Ch. 7 Case No. 10–30064, Adv. No. 10–3361 (Bankr.S.D.Ohio 2013) ECF No. 97, we affirm.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Slone v. Anderson (In re Anderson)
(May 15, 2014)