AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Commercial Tenant Ser v. ces, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant,

Friedman, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Kahn, Oing, JJ.

Friedman Kaplan Seiler & Adelman LLP, New York (Robert S. Smith of counsel), for appellant.

O'Brien LLP, New York (Sean R. O'Brien of counsel), for respondent.

Appeals from orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Barry R. Ostrager, J.), entered on or about November 29, 2017, on or about March 19, 2018, and on or about June 29, 2018, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

While there is no impediment to plaintiff's raising before the trial court the arguments it presses on appeal concerning whether it must demonstrate that it was the procuring cause to prevail on its claim for fees, there is no basis for an appeal here. Plaintiff does not seek to disturb the motion court's dispositive rulings but asks us essentially to "reverse" certain statements made by the court in dicta.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: OCTOBER 11, 2018

CLERK

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Commercial Tenant Servs., Inc. v. Barclay's Servs. Corp.
(Oct 11, 2018)