AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Mohammed KHAN, Defendant–Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jan Hoth of counsel), and White & Case LLP, New York (Louis O'Neill of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Nicole Coviello of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Analisa Torres, J.), rendered August 1, 2011, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of sexual abuse in the first degree, forcible touching and endangering the welfare of a child, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant did not preserve his contention that the court's jury instructions were deficient because they did not inform the jury that the People were required to prove the specific conduct alleged in the indictment. This is a claim requiring preservation ( see People v. Whitecloud, 110 A.D.3d 626, 973 N.Y.S.2d 216 [1st Dept.2013] ), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find no basis for reversal ( see People v. Grega, 72 N.Y.2d 489, 496, 534 N.Y.S.2d 647, 531 N.E.2d 279 [1988] ). The court's instructions included all the elements of the crimes charged. Given the trial evidence, there is no reasonable possibility that the jury convicted defendant on any factual theory other than the one alleged in the indictment. Defendant's arguments to the contrary are based on speculation.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. FRIEDMAN, J.P., ACOSTA, RENWICK, MANZANET–DANIELS, GISCHE, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

People v. Khan
(Dec 17, 2013)