AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

MARCY HILL, PATRICIA HILL, and CHRISTOPHER HILL, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SEARS ROEBUCK COMPANY, SEARS LOGISTIC SERVICES, INC., EXEL DIRECT, INC. and MERCHANT DELIVERY, INC., Defendants-Appellees, and MARK PRITCHARD and TIMOTHY DAMERON, Defendants-Appellants. and CHARLES R. LINDSEY, ORALIA J. LINDSEY, and ALBERT KIMPE, Defendants. MARCY HILL, PATRICIA HILL, and CHRISTOPHER HILL, SEARS ROEBUCK COMPANY, SEARS LOGISTIC SERVICES, INC., MARK PRITCHARD, and TIMOTHY DAMERON, Defendants-Appellees, and EXEL DIRECT, INC. and MERCHANT DELIVERY, INC., Defendants-Appellants, and Plaintiffs-Appellees,

Order

SC: 143329, 143348, 143633, COA: 295071, Macomb CC: 2007-003755-NO

On order of the Court, the applications for leave to appeal the May 24, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals are considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the applications or take other action. MCR 7.302(H)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall include among the issues addressed: (1) whether the defendant installers of the electrical appliance, Mark Pritchard and Timothy Dameron, had a duty to the plaintiffs with respect to the uncapped gas line in their home that was separate and distinct from their contractual duty to properly and safely install the electrical appliance; (2) whether these defendant installers created a new dangerous condition with respect to the uncapped gas line, or made an existing dangerous condition more hazardous; and (3) whether defendants-appellants Sears Roebuck Company, Sears Logistic Services, Inc., Exel Direct, Inc., and Merchant Delivery, Inc., breached any duty owed to the plaintiffs. The parties may file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order, but they should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HILL v. SEARS ROEBUCK COMPANY, 143329 (Mich. 10-26-2011)
(Oct 26, 2011)