Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

Troy Lehman, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Troy Lehman appeals from the trial court's order dismissing his application for post-conviction relief. On appeal, Lehman proffers four grounds he claims constitute ineffective assistance of counsel. He argues his trial counsel failed to call relevant witnesses, inadequately cross-examined the State's witnesses, forced him to waive his right to testify, improperly allowed the information to be amended, and improperly waived his right to an arraignment and a preliminary hearing regarding a terrorizing charge.

[¶ 2] We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶ 3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Mary Muehlen Maring

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LEHMAN v. STATE
(Dec 13, 2011)