Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SHAW v. UNITED STATES.

American Sugar Refining Co. v. United States, 211 U.S. 155, which held that a direct appeal from the Circuit Court would not lie in a case where the only real substantial point was whether an officer of the United States had misconstrued the tariff act of 1897, followed, and appeal dismissed. Writ of error to reverse 141 F. 469, dismissed.

Per Curiam:

Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Shaw v. United States, 141 F. 469; United States v. Shaw, 144 F. 329, and opinion of Board of General Appraisers, Shaw v. United States, 203 U.S. 591; American Sugar Refining Company v. United States, decided to-day, 211 U.S. 155.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SHAW v. UNITED STATES
(Nov 30, 1908)