Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ALFONSO BETANCOURT, and SCCORRO BETANCOURT, a Minor, ENEDINA BETANCOURT, a Minor, ARMANDO BETANCOURT, a Minor, NOEMI BETANCOURT, a Minor, and ESTHER BETANCOURT, a Minor, by ALFONSO BETANCOURT, Their Guardian Ad Litem, Appellants, v. LOGIA SUPREMA DE LA ALIANZA HISPANO-AMERICANA, a Corporation, Appellee.

COSTS. — Where benefit society did not tender to beneficiaries amount of premiums paid on life policy until after filing of suit to recover on policy, and when tendered did not include costs beneficiaries had incurred up to time of tender, beneficiaries were entitled to judgment for premiums paid and this would have carried with it their costs in superior court.

See 7 Cal. Jur. 256; 14 Am. Jur. 9.

McALISTER, J.

Appellants seek a rehearing upon the ground that they are entitled to judgment for the premiums paid, $3.80, if not for the face of the policy. These premiums were not tendered by appellee prior to the filing of suit to recover on the policy and did not when tendered include the costs appellants had incurred up to that time. This being the situation, judgment for $3.80 should have been rendered in favor of appellants, and this would have carried with it their costs in the superior court. The order entered by this court on February 6, 1939, affirming the action of the trial court in directing a verdict for appellee is modified to this extent.

ROSS, C.J., and LOCKWOOD, J., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BETANCOURT v. LOGIA SUPREMA, ETC
(Mar 20, 1939)