CRUMMY v. HORNI, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Algernon T. Sweeney argued the cause for the appellants. Mr. Andrew B. Crummy argued the cause for the respondents.

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

ANDREW B. CRUMMY, TRUSTEE OF HORNI SIGNAL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION,PLAINTIFF, v. JOSEPH T. HORNI, CARAN REALTY CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.LOUIS EISENSTODT AND JAMES VENEZIANO, FORMERLY PARTNERS TRADING AS L.EISENSTODT, PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS,

PER CURIAM.

Following the argument of this cause counsel for the respective parties stipulated and agreed that the appellants were entitled to judgment against the respondents in the sum of $3,807.29 debt and $751.82 interest. The judgment under review is accordingly reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded to the Superior Court with instructions to enter judgment in favor of the appellants and against the respondents in the sum of $4,559.11, and costs.

For reversal — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING and ACKERSON — 6.

For affirmance — None.

CRUMMY v. HORNI

ANDREW B. CRUMMY, TRUSTEE OF HORNI SIGNAL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION,PLAINTIFF, v. JOSEPH T. HORNI, CARAN REALTY CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.LOUIS EISENSTODT AND JAMES VENEZIANO, FORMERLY PARTNERS TRADING AS L.EISENSTODT, PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS,

Comments