Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ROUSH ET AL., APPELLANTS v. BARTHALOW, AUD., ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Municipal corporations — Annexation of territory contiguous to city and village — Sought by village — Section 3558 et seq., General Code — Petition by freeholders for annexation to city — Section 3548 et seq., General Code — Proceedings by village stayed pending election — Section 3561-1, General Code — Proceedings on freeholders' petition not stayed, when — Freeholder's attempted withdrawal of signature — Annexation to city granted on freeholders' petition — Action to enjoin annexation — Parties — "Any person interested," defined — Section 3532, General Code — Whether annexation right, just and equitable issue on trial — Sections 3534 and 3535, General Code — Due process — Section 16, Article 1, Constitution — Section 1, Article XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution.

Per Curiam.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, MIDDLETON, TAFT, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROUSH v. BARTHALOW
(Jan 16, 1952)