Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Criminal law — Gambling — Promoting "numbers game" — Section 13064-1, General Code — Sufficiency of indictment — Necessity for charging acts done "for his own profit" — Rule of in pari materia not applicable, when — Sentence — Not void, when — Failure of accused's counsel to request stenographer at trial — Not ground for reversal, when.
It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., MIDDLETON, TAFT, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART and LAMNECK, JJ., concur.