Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

CITY OF WHITESBURG, Kentucky, Appellant, v. Jesse BATES et al., Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The City of Whitesburg has moved for an appeal from a judgment awarding appellees Jesse and Della Bates the sum of $1,000 on their claim for rent due on a tract of land which the city allegedly leased to use as a parking lot. A number of legal and constitutional issues are raised on this appeal which were not properly presented to the trial court.

On motion for summary judgment the city attempted to raise the issue of the statute of frauds. This defense should have been raised by answer. CR 8.03. Even if properly presented by motion, the issue became moot when appellees relinquished their claim to more than seven months' rent.

On a motion to dismiss, filed the day of trial, the city attempted to raise the defense of illegality of the contract under Sections 157 and 162 of the Kentucky Constitution. This was likewise an affirmative defense which should have been specially pleaded under CR 8.03. Even if the motion could be considered as a pleading, it did not state sufficient facts to constitute a defense on this ground.

The trial court properly denied appellant's motions, and the judgment was based on a jury verdict amply supported by the evidence in the case.

The motion for appeal is denied and the judgment stands affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CITY OF WHITESBURG v. BATES
(Jan 23, 1959)