Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of the Claim of GUS WALKER, Respondent, against JOHN NAROLEWSKI, Doing Business as Rainbow Inn Rainbow Drive-In, et al., Appellants. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION BOARD, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs to the Workmen's Compensation Board; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge CONWAY and Judges DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL and BURKE. Judge VAN VOORHIS dissents and votes to dismiss the claim for the reasons stated by Justice HERLIHY in his dissenting memorandum in the Appellate Division.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF WALKER v. NAROLEWSKI
(Dec 30, 1959)