Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE STATE, EX REL. TURRIN, APPELLANT v. COUNTY COURT OF TUSCARAWAS COUNTY, CENTRAL DISTRICT, ET AL., APPELLEES. THE STATE, EX REL. HASSIN, APPELLANT

County Courts — Division into areas of jurisdiction by Common Pleas Court — Section 1907.071, Revised Code — New township formed by dividing existing township — Effect on jurisdiction of County Court Areas — Delay in announcing judgment — Section 2938.11 (F), Revised Code.

Per Curiam.

The dividing by the county commissioners of the area of one township into two townships did not effect a change in the territorial jurisdiction of the County Court. The County Court, Central Area, retains jurisdiction over the area previously designated by the Common Pleas Court, including the area of the new township created totally within the area so previously designated.

In regard to the contention in the Hassin case that Section 2938.11 (F), Revised Code, was not complied with, the petition alleges that the case was submitted on December 14, 1964, at 11 a. m., and the judgment was announced on December 16, 1964, at 2 p. m. The statutory provision is directory and was sufficiently complied with. See City of Columbus v. Nappi, 5 Ohio St.2d 99.

Judgments affirmed.

TAFT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, MATTHIAS, O'NEILL, HERBERT, SCHNEIDER and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE, EX REL. TURRIN v. COUNTY COURT
(Mar 2, 1966)