Citation Codes Equivalent Citations citation codes Docket Number No. 18938. Attorney(S) William T. Campbell, Swartz, Campbell Detweiler, Philadelphia, Pa. (William J. McKinley, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellants. David I. Grunfeld, Steinberg, Greenstein, Richman Price, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellees. Judges Gerald McLaughlin Francis Lund Van Dusen John Berne Hannum See more information ... Smart Summary Please sign up to generate summary. OPINION Margaret Ann FLEMING, a minor, by her Guardian, Al v. n H. Frankel, and Robert Fleming Gladys, his wife OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM: On review of the record, showing, inter alia, that the appeal challenges a district court order denying a motion to dismiss the action, we do not reach the merits. Appellants urge the applicability here of Groh v. Brooks, 421 F.2d 589 (3d Cir. 1970), which held merely that the District Court was justified in its discretion in dismissing the complaint without prejudice to its reinstatement if defendants did not in fact waive the statute of limitations in the state court under the facts in that case. The state court had not refused to hear the case as here. In accordance with Commonwealth of Pennyslvania v. Brown, 3 Cir., 373 F.2d 771, at 776, where the court said: "It is settled that denial of a motion to dismiss, even when the motion is based on jurisdictional grounds, is not immediately reviewable." Catlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229, 236, 65 S.Ct. 631, 635, 89 L.Ed. 911 (1945). for lack of an appealable order, this appeal will be dismissed.