CALLOWAY v. SAND CASTLE, INC, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Marvin D. Perskie, argued the cause for respondent-appellant ( Messrs. Perskie Perskie, attorneys.) Mr. Vincent L. Lamanna, Jr. argued the cause for petitioner-respondent ( Messrs. Rubins Lamanna, attorneys.)

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

EARL W. CALLOWAY, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION AND EARL W. CALLOWAY,INDIVIDUALLY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. SAND CASTLE, INC., A NEW JERSEYCORPORATION AND GUS FERRETTI, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

This matter having come before the Court on Petition for Certification, ( 62 N.J. 86) judgment of the Appellate Division in this matter be and is herewith reversed; and

It is further Ordered and Adjudged that the matter be remanded to the Appellate Division for consideration of the other grounds of appeal raised, and

It is further Ordered and Adjudged that the Appellate Division shall have the discretion, if it deems it proper, to require the trial court to take testimony from the juror in question.

For reversal and remandment — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, HALL, PROCTOR and MOUNTAIN and Judges SULLIVAN and CONFORD — 7.

Opposed — None.

CALLOWAY v. SAND CASTLE, INC

EARL W. CALLOWAY, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION AND EARL W. CALLOWAY,INDIVIDUALLY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. SAND CASTLE, INC., A NEW JERSEYCORPORATION AND GUS FERRETTI, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Comments