BRODY v. CITY OF MILLVILLE, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Anthony D. Buonadonna, argued the cause for appellant ( Messrs. Tuso and Gruccio, attorneys). Mr. Edward S. Miller argued the cause for respondent, City of Millville ( Messrs. Gant and Miller, attorneys). Mr. Paul R. Porreca appeared for respondent, Airwork.

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Anthony D. Buonadonna, argued the cause for appellant ( Messrs. Tuso and Gruccio, attorneys). Mr. Edward S. Miller argued the cause for respondent, City of Millville ( Messrs. Gant and Miller, attorneys). Mr. Paul R. Porreca appeared for respondent, Airwork.

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

SIDNEY L. BRODY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF MILLVILLE AND AIRWORKSERVICE DIVISION OF PACIFIC AIRMOTIVE, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division, 120 N.J. Super. 1, is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in its opinion.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, Justices JACOBS, HALL and MOUNTAIN, and Judges SULLIVAN and LEWIS — 6.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.