Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RODNEY CULPEPPER, Appellant.

Order modified and case remitted to Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum, and, as so modified, affirmed: Each of defendant's convictions is affirmed. No warrant appears in this record, however, for the increase in defendant's sentences predicated on his contumacious remark to the court. While we have sympathy for the feelings of the sentencing Judge, the increase cannot be justified under sentencing procedures nor supported under the guise of punishment for contempt of court. Accordingly, defendant's sentence is vacated and the case is remitted with a direction to resentence defendant to the sentence originally imposed.

Concur: Judges BURKE, BREITEL, JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES and WACHTLER. Taking no part: Chief Judge FULD.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. CULPEPPER
(Dec 27, 1973)