Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOSE MARTINEZ, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.

RYDER, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellant was charged with possession of cocaine and possession of cocaine with intent to sell or deliver. He filed a motion to suppress the cocaine that had been seized. The trial court denied the motion and appellant entered a plea of nolo contendere, reserving the right to appeal the denial of the motion.

The trial court dismissed the possession of cocaine with intent to sell charge. Appellant's recommended guidelines sentence was any nonstate prison sanction. The trial court sentenced appellant to five years' incarceration, but failed to enter any written reasons for its departure from the recommended guidelines sentence. This appeal challenges the trial court's denial of the motion to suppress and the subsequent sentence imposed.

We have reviewed the record and considered the applicable case law and statutes, as well as the arguments in the briefs submitted as to the denial of appellant's motion to suppress. We find no error in the trial court's ruling. Accordingly, we affirm appellant's conviction.

In sentencing appellant, the trial court erred in failing to enter written reasons for departure. Nichols v. State, 521 So.2d 372 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). We must reverse appellant's sentence and remand for resentencing within the guidelines recommended range. Shull v. Dugger, 515 So.2d 748 (Fla. 1987).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded with instructions.

HALL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MARTINEZ v. STATE
(Jun 24, 1988)