Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BRIAN LITVIN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

We grant rehearing, withdraw our opinion of December 22, 1993, and substitute the following opinion:

We affirm the trial court order denying post-conviction relief in all respects except with regard to the computation of gain time concerning which the state acknowledges error. Upon sentencing following a violation of probation, Appellant was entitled to a credit for time served, including earned gain time. The Appellant was initially incarcerated prior to October 1, 1989. See Tripp v. State, 622 So.2d 941 (Fla. 1993); Thomas v. State, 627 So.2d 1295 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Jean v. State, 627 So.2d 592 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Springer v. State, 626 So.2d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

The record reflects that Appellant is entitled to a credit of four years served in prison plus 312 days in jail.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings.

ANSTEAD, GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LITVIN v. STATE
(May 18, 1994)