Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MICHAEL BARYCHKO, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant's conviction and sentence without prejudice to appellant's right to seek post-conviction relief pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

AFFIRMED.

DELL and PARIENTE JJ., concur.

GROSS, J., concurs specially with opinion.

GROSS, J., concurring.

I concur in the affirmance in this case. Appellant's trial counsel did not preserve his objection to the seating of the alternate juror. The issue as to the use of the codefendant's statement was well argued by appellate counsel. However, a close examination of the record demonstrates that the trial court carefully and correctly resolved this issue after an overnight recess and a chance to examine the transcript. Trial counsel opened the door to the use of the statement during his cross-examination. The prosecutor's use of the statement during closing argument was not preserved by a timely objection and I do not find the error to be fundamental.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BARYCHKO v. STATE
(Sep 3, 1997)