ORDERED that the judgments are affirmed.
The defendant's claim that the testimony of the eyewitness was incredible as a matter of law is unpreserved for appellate review because his attorney did not make that argument before the trial court ( see, CPL 470.05; People v. Gray, 86 N.Y.2d 10; People v. Ings, 248 A.D.2d 485). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed murder in the second degree and rape in the first degree. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see, CPL 470.15).
There is no merit to the defendant's claim that he was denied the meaningful representation of counsel ( see, People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708).
The sentences imposed were not excessive ( see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
S. MILLER, J.P., SANTUCCI, SULLIVAN, and FLORIO, JJ., concur.