AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

EDWARD A. ZACHER, et al., plaintiffs, v. OAKDALE ISLANDIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, defendant third-party plaintiff-respondent, BUILD, INC., defendant-appellant, et al., defendants; FIRST INDEMNITY OF AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., third-party defendants-appellants.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal by Daniel DiDominici is dismissed for failure to perfect the same in accordance with the rules of this court (see, 22 NYCRR 670.8[e]); and it is further,

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,

ORDERED that the defendant third-party plaintiff-respondent is awarded one bill of costs payable by the appellants Build, Inc., and First Indemnity of America Insurance Company.

The contention of the defendant Build, Inc. (hereinafter Build), that the order dated December 7, 1990, should be vacated because it violated a stay which was allegedly in effect while Build's prior counsel was seeking leave to withdraw is without merit. Such a stay applies only when an attorney dies, becomes disabled, or has been removed (see, CPLR 321[c]; Sassower v. Blaustein, 208 A.D.2d 820 ). Since none of these circumstances existed here, no stay was in effect. We decline to reach Build's remaining contention, as it was not properly raised before the Supreme Court and, therefore, is raised for the first time on appeal (see, American Home Assur. Co. v. Choudary, 255 A.D.2d 346 ; Pinkston v. Weiss, 238 A.D.2d 393 ; Lumbermen's Mut. Cas. Co. v. Morse Shoe Co., 218 A.D.2d 624 ).

The performance bond issued by First Indemnity of America Insurance Company (hereinafter FIA) did not expressly require a notice of default as a condition precedent to any legal action on the bond. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the motion of FIA, inter alia, for summary judgment dismissing the third-party action on the ground that it had not been notified that its principal had defaulted upon the underlying contract (see, Menorah Nursing Home v. Zukov, 153 A.D.2d 13 ; Babylon Assocs. v. County of Suffolk, 101 A.D.2d 207 ).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ZACHER v. OAKDALE ISLANDIA LIMITED PART
(Apr 3, 2000)