Citation Codes Equivalent Citations citation codes Docket Number No. 99-17372. Attorney(S) Bebe J. Anderson, The Center for Reproductive Law Policy, New York, N.Y. and Michael Owen Miller, Miller Smith LLP, Tucson, Arizona for the plaintiffs-appellees. Charles R. Pyle, Assistant Attorney General, Tucson, Arizona, for the defendants-appellants. Judges Mary Murphy Schroeder See more information ... Smart Summary Please sign up to generate summary. OPINION Fred FORBES; Margaret Bohn; John L. Summers; Ann S. Anderson, Stuart R. Snider; George Melcher, Jr.; Christopher Tisch; Planned Parenthood of Central and Northern Arizona, Inc.; Robert Tamis, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Janet NAPOLITANO, in her capacity as Attorney General, State of Arizona; Stephen Neely, in his capacity as County Attorney, Pima County, Arizona, Defendants-Appellants. ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge. ORDER Appellants have filed a petition for rehearing that pertains to one sentence of the court's opinion. The sentence reads: "But where a statute criminalizes conduct, the law may not be impermissibly vague in any of its applications." Forbes v. Napolitano, 236 F.3d 1009, 1011 (9th Cir. 2000). The petition for rehearing is GRANTED to the extent that the sentence in question is deleted, and the following substituted: "But where a statute criminalizes conduct, the law may be invalidated on vagueness grounds even if it could conceivably have some valid application."