AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

RAYMOND J. DZIEDZIC, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF MARTHA DZIEDZIC, DECEASED, Plaintiff-respondent, v. FOSTER H. THAYER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, DENNIS J. STACK, UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOCIATION OF WESTERN NEW YORK, INC., VIRGINIA PURCELL, AS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOCIATION OF WESTERN NEW YORK, INC., UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOCIATION, INC., MICHAEL MORRIS, AS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOCIATION, INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. (ACTION NO. 1.) — KATHERINE DZIEDZIC, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

This appeal arises from a five-vehicle accident in which Martha Dziedzic was killed and plaintiff Katherine Dziedzic was injured. The Dziedzic vehicle was initially rear-ended by a vehicle driven by defendant Foster H. Thayer, causing the Dziedzic vehicle to be involved in a further collision. Contrary to the contention of Dennis J. Stack, United Cerebral Palsy Association of Western New York, Inc., Virginia Purcell, United Cerebral Palsy Association, Inc. (UCPA) and Michael Morris (defendants), Supreme Court properly denied their cross motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint in each action against them. In support of their cross motion, defendants submitted Thayer's deposition testimony in which Thayer testified that Stack's vehicle was moving from side to side in the curb lane and had come partly into the passing lane as Thayer was attempting to pass Stack's vehicle. In addition, Thayer testified that he was concerned that he would be forced into oncoming traffic. Defendants failed to establish as a matter of law that Stack was not negligent in the operation of his vehicle ( see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1122 [b]; § 1128 [a]; see also, 8B N.Y. Jur 2d, Automobiles, § 956) or that Stack's conduct in allegedly distracting Thayer was not a proximate cause of the accident ( see, Sartori v. Gregoire, 259 A.D.2d 1004).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DZIEDZIC v. THAYER
(Mar 15, 2002)