AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MICHAEL SPALLHOLTZ, et al., plaintiffs-respondents, v. HAMPTON C.F. CORP., et al., defendants-respondents, MT. HOPE ROCK PRODUCTS, INC., appellant (AND A THIRD-PARTY ACTION).

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In response to the appellant's prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiffs produced "evidentiary proof in admissible form sufficient to establish the existence of material issues of fact which require a trial of the action" (Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 324). This proof established issues of fact regarding whether the appellant owned the subject machine. In addition, there are issues of fact, among others, as to the nature of the relationship between the appellant and the defendant New Hope Pipe Liners, Inc., and the extent to which the appellant asserted control over the subject machine.

SMITH, J.P., O'BRIEN, McGINITY and TOWNES, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SPALLHOLTZ v. HAMPTON C.F. CORP
(May 13, 2002)